Shrinking of Aral Sea Leaves Central Asians Suffering 

                      Ecology: Soviets' diversion of water for irrigation has
                   bequeathed a host of economic and health problems. 

                   By RICHARD BOUDREAUX, Times Staff Writer

                        MUINAK, Uzbekistan--The old man roams what used to
                   be the floor of the Aral Sea, coaxing a ram, a goat and a
                   cow in search of food in what is now relentless desert. 
                         Not far away is the rusting hull of the fishing boat
                   that three decades ago he sailed high above, on the
                   surface of bountiful waters. The marooned wreck stands
                   askew amid a ghostly fleet anchored in salty dunes. 
                         Stopping his tiny herd in a patch of desert grass, he
                   encounters a stranger who inquires about the sea. 
                        "I can no longer imagine any sea out there," replies
                   Sanginkik Saktaganov, turning his lean, weathered face
                   north toward the horizon where the shore disappeared. "I
                   don't think it will ever come back." 
                        It is a pitiful epitaph for Central Asia's dying fountain
                   of life, uttered from a harsh and poisoned landscape that
                   is the region's costliest legacy of Soviet rule. The
                   presidents of the five countries dependent on the sea
                   have joined to lobby for worldwide help, but they have
                   received only modest commitments and even less relief. 
                        "You cannot fill the Aral Sea with tears," says an Uzbek
                   poem. 
                        Until 1960, the Aral was the world's fourth-largest
                   lake and produced 160 tons of fish a day, much of it
                   hauled in boats like Saktaganov's to a huge cannery in
                   this onetime coastal city. 
                        Then, in one of humankind's cruelest assaults on
                   nature, Soviet engineers began diverting the two Aral
                   tributaries into the desert to irrigate the world's largest
                   cotton belt. 
                        Today the sea has shriveled to a third of its former
                   volume and split into near-lifeless lagoons, its nearest
                   shore 30 miles from here. The Aral watershed, which
                   sustains most of Central Asia's 54 million people, is
                   poisoned. 
                        Chemical pesticides and fertilizers wash from irrigated
                   cotton fields into the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers,
                   polluting much of the region's drinking water, its soil and
                   the sea. Toxic salts and dust blown off the exposed sea
                   bottom by blinding windstorms turn everything
                   grayish-brown. 
                        Millions of people are sickened by the air and water, and
                   impoverished by the loss of fish and fertile land. The drying
                   of the Aral, whose water volume moderated the weather,
                   has brought Sahara-like extremes of hot and cold to the
                   valleys nearby, cutting the growing season by two months.

                                         * * *
                         Worst of all, the Soviet Union, which created this
                   mess, is not around to clean it up. The five Central Asian
                   republics that emerged from the Soviet collapse in late
                   1991 lack the resources to cope. 
                        Their most ambitious plans for the Aral watershed
                   stop short of reviving the sea or even halting its
                   shrinkage. 
                        The Caspian Sea, 370 miles west of here, is rising. But
                   building a canal and pumping the spillover to the Aral
                   would cost $280 billion, and officials say that's utopian.
                   Reversing one of Russia's northward-flowing Siberian
                   rivers toward the Aral--an old Soviet idea--is rejected as
                   ecocidal. 
                        Some environmentalists insist that drastic cutbacks
                   in cotton growing could save enough water to bring back
                   the sea. 
                        But weak economies and growing populations put
                   national leaders under pressure to use any leftover water
                   to grow more food. Before they can even think about the
                   sea, officials say, the region must cope with the public
                   health and economic calamities that have come in the
                   wake of the Aral's depletion. 
                        "All the parties recognize that restoring the sea to its
                   1960 level or anything approaching that is just not
                   feasible," said Peter Whitford, manager of the World
                   Bank's Aral basin aid project. "But a lot more can be done
                   to meet the human needs in the disaster zone and to put
                   land and water management on a more rational footing." 
                        Reacting to a March 1993 appeal by Kazakhstan,
                   Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, the
                   World Bank helped these countries draft 19 such
                   projects--expected to cost $450 million over several
                   years--and organized a June 1994 donors conference in
                   Paris. 
                        The results were disappointing. Donor nations pledged
                   $31 million of the $40 million asked for a one-year
                   start-up phase and delivered just $15.7 million--mostly
                   for studies by Western consultants. 
                        "So many round tables, seminars and conferences, so
                   many reports published on problems we've known about
                   for years!" exclaimed geologist Gaip Khudainsasar,
                   pointing to piles of volumes in his cluttered office in
                   Turkmenistan. "Yet the Aral keeps shrinking, and the
                   ecology of the basin has not improved." 
                        While environmentalists echo his frustration, some
                   small improvements are underway. 
                        On the desolate shore of a small lake near Muinak, four
                   bulldozers kick up clouds of dust as they flatten the
                   sandy ground for seedlings. Workmen are laying irrigation
                   pipes to the new forest from the nearby Amu Darya. 
                        Bekullah Davletiyarov, a 41-year-old hydraulic engineer,
                   wore an immaculate white suit to inspect his
                   U.N.-financed project, the first of a series of "green belts"
                   that will shield the Amu Darya delta from poisonous Aral
                   dust. 
                        The U.S. Agency for International Development has
                   brought safer drinking water to about 500,000 people by
                   cleaning up 29 wells in Kazakhstan and building or
                   upgrading seven water treatment plants in Turkmenistan
                   and Uzbekistan. 
                        But little help has come to this dried-up fishing port,
                   despite a plaintive billboard at one entrance. In English it
                   reads: "The catastrophe of the Aral Sea . . . is a disaster
                   on a global scale, which Uzbekistan and its neighbors
                   cannot cope with alone." 
                        Few places have been hit as hard as Muinak. 
                                         * * *
                         The cannery, still its chief employer, takes a reduced
                   catch from nearby reservoirs and fish farms. But
                   impatient creditors have cut off tin supplies, idling the
                   cannery's 860 employees without pay for most of this
                   year. 
                        People loitering on dusty streets talk of illness,
                   hunger, desperation. 
                        A middle-aged woman pounced from a bread line not
                   long ago, witnesses recall, and stole a loaf from a
                   teen-age girl. The girl's mother chased the thief home,
                   where she was found dividing the bread among five frail
                   children--and mercifully left alone. 
                        Dr. Abdurashid Ubiyev, deputy chief of the Muinak
                   hospital, said the town gets 70% of its medicine from
                   American and European donors but not enough to cope
                   with soaring disease rates. 
                        Last year, for example, 23 of the town's 24,000 people
                   had tuberculosis, the doctor reported; now 78 do, and no
                   one outside Muinak helps treat them. Another 74 have
                   cancer, he said--half again as many as in 1993. Other
                   specialists say 87% of all children here are born anemic
                   and that infant mortality is 110 per 1,000--a rate
                   comparable to Uganda's. 
                        "Tell me one thing," said Dr. Oral Ataniazova, director of
                   the institute on women's and children's medicine in Nukus,
                   the nearest city. "If there is a sincere will to solve the Aral
                   Sea problem, why after five years isn't there clean water in
                   every town in the delta?" 
                        Uzbek President Islam Karimov, accused in Muinak of
                   ignoring the town, has led the criticism of foreign donors
                   for not giving more. 
                        But the World Bank is delaying a new appeal for
                   donations until the Central Asians show more will to
                   confront the problem. They have not kept two pledges--to
                   give real power to a five-nation body to push Aral basin
                   projects, and to set aside 1% of each nation's income to
                   pay for them. 
                        Saving precious water in the basin will depend on other
                   hard decisions. 
                        Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, whose leaders resist
                   free-market reform, have yet to set prices for water
                   use--a step to control waste. 
                        Nor have Central Asian leaders as a group begun to
                   compromise over sharing rivers that flow through all five
                   countries. A Soviet-era plan of water allocation remains in
                   effect as they try, with multinational advice, to write a
                   new one; in practice, each hoards what water it can and
                   mistrusts its neighbors. 
                        Meanwhile, the Aral continues to lose more water to
                   evaporation than it gains from rainfall and its beleaguered
                   tributaries. Scientists expect it to stabilize at about half
                   its current size. 
                        In Muinak today, the shore is visible only from the
                   town's Aral Sea Museum--through a surreal window on
                   the past. 
                        Carp, pike and other fish that once thrived in the Aral
                   line a museum shelf, head down in glass jars. Old fishing
                   nets hang from the walls. Stuffed carcasses of animals
                   that roamed the wooded shore--foxes, wolves, jackals and
                   badgers--hold rigid poses. There's a kayak, plus some
                   wooden models of ferries, trawlers and barges. 
                        Among the paintings is one of a woman in a head scarf
                   and a girl with pigtails standing by a fishing boat on the
                   Aral shore. 
                        They are looking at the sea. 
                        * * * 

                        The Shrinking Sea 
                        How the Aral Sea has shrunk since 1960 and what it
                   might look like in the year 2000. 

                         

                   Copyright Los Angeles Times